A few days
ago, the local newspapers in Bihar carried reports of a burn victim dying a
painful death because the ambulance carrying her was caught up in a ‘traffic
jam’ on the rickety Mahatma Gandhi Setu, the bridge that joins Patna to North
Bihar.
The woman
died because the Home Guards, an auxiliary security force, had blocked the
bridge in protest. They were demanding benefits from the Bihar Government.
These men turned a deaf ear to the pleas of the ambulance driver and the people
who were in the ambulance. They wilfully obstructed an ambulance that
according to law had the absolute right of way. If anybody is to be held
responsible for the death of that woman, it is the organizers and the men from
the Home Guards who were obstructing traffic. Logic says that a criminal case
should have been slapped on them.
Have our politicians sunk so low? Is
heckling the government and encouraging others to do so their only game? You condone uncivilized and brutish behaviour -such
as the obstruction of an ambulance carrying a burn patient in a critical
condition on a hot summer’s day - on the one hand, and complain of ‘Jungle
raj’ returning to Bihar on the other!
The BJP (and
others in the opposition) would have done
the honourable thing if they had strongly taken on the government for going soft on the ringleaders, and failing to
punish the fellows who were actually responsible for manslaughter because they
obstructed the ambulance, with the full knowledge that the patient inside would
die unless she received immediate treatment.
Why is it that whenever there is some 'political' support, a 'legitimate' protest becomes an occasion to threaten, beat-up, smash and vent anger on inanimate objects and harmless individuals?
Author: Frank Krishner
Why are two separate issues being muddied up? And why is the present government and the administration letting this happen? Why hasn't the Nitish Kumar administration really shown some 'testosterone' and booked a couple of those protestors for manslaughter?
Why is it that whenever there is some 'political' support, a 'legitimate' protest becomes an occasion to threaten, beat-up, smash and vent anger on inanimate objects and harmless individuals?
The right
to lawful protest is one thing, causing harmful obstruction and destroying
government and private property are entirely different. They are cowardly, criminal offences.
Why are all political parties blind to this? 'This is an election year' isn't the right answer!
Author: Frank Krishner